Business Valuation for Solvency & Insolvency Opinions
Solvency and insolvency opinions are valuation-based analyses used to assess a company’s financial condition at a specific point in time, typically in connection with transactions that materially affect capital structure, leverage, or creditor interests.
These engagements are frequently required in financing and transactional contexts, and may be relied upon by boards, lenders, counsel, and other stakeholders.
A solvency opinion is an opinion supported by valuation analysis. The same analytical framework may also be used to evaluate insolvency; the distinction lies in the conclusion reached, not in a different type of valuation engagement.
When Solvency or Insolvency Opinions Can Be Mandatory
Transactions Affecting Capital Structure
- leveraged acquisitions and recapitalizations
- significant debt financings or refinancings
- dividend distributions or redemptions funded with debt
- asset transfers and corporate restructurings
These transactions may require an independent solvency opinion to confirm that the company can meet its obligations following the transaction.
Lender, Investor, and Counterparty Requirements
Financial institutions and counterparties may require solvency opinions when:
- new debt is supported by enterprise value rather than collateral
- creditor positions are subordinated or restructured
- transactions depend on projected cash flows
In these cases, the analysis supports underwriting and risk assessment.
Fiduciary Duty Considerations
Boards and management may obtain solvency opinions to demonstrate informed decision-making in situations involving:
- transactions with increased leverage
- distributions to shareholders
- related-party or insider transactions
Distressed and Litigation Contexts
Insolvency analyses are often required in:
- restructuring and workout negotiations
- pre-bankruptcy planning
- fraudulent conveyance and preference claims
- creditor disputes and litigation
In these settings, the analysis may address whether and when insolvency occurred.
The Three-Test Framework in Solvency and Insolvency Analysis
Solvency and insolvency analyses are commonly evaluated using three complementary tests:
Balance Sheet Test
- comparison of the fair value of assets and liabilities
- inclusion of contingent and off-balance-sheet obligations
A company is insolvent under this test if liabilities exceed the fair value of assets.
Cash Flow Test
- ability to meet obligations as they come due
- analysis of liquidity and projected cash flows
A company may be considered insolvent if it cannot pay its debts in the ordinary course of business.
Capital Adequacy Test
- sufficiency of capital relative to business risk
- forward-looking assessment based on reasonable projections
Failure occurs when a company is left with unreasonably small capital.
Role of Business Valuation
Solvency and insolvency opinions require valuation analysis because:
- asset values may differ materially from accounting values
- enterprise value and intangible assets may be relevant
- forward-looking assumptions affect liquidity and capital adequacy
The valuation analysis supports the application of the solvency tests and the resulting opinion.
Valuation Considerations
- analysis is typically performed at the enterprise level
- assumptions may include going-concern or, where appropriate, liquidation considerations
- contingent liabilities and off-balance-sheet exposures are evaluated
- scenario and sensitivity analyses may be applied
There is no single mandated standard of value; however, analyses commonly reflect fair value concepts and market-based assumptions appropriate to the engagement.
Engagement Scope and Deliverables
Given the reliance placed on these analyses, engagements are typically performed as:
- Valuation with a Conclusion of Value
- Detailed Report with supporting analysis
These engagements are not suitable for:
- calculation engagements
- rule-of-thumb estimates
- informal or internal-only analyses
Reporting Framework and Standards
Solvency and insolvency analyses are valuation engagements performed in accordance with the Professional Standards and Code of Ethics of the National Association of Certified Valuators and Analysts (NACVA), as applicable.
Consistent with these standards, the engagement requires:
- identification of assets and liabilities
- determination of value under appropriate assumptions
- application of relevant valuation approaches and methods
- documentation of assumptions, inputs, and analytical procedures
The deliverable is structured to support reliance by boards, lenders, counsel, and, where applicable, courts.
Related Services
Valuations may also be required in bankruptcy and restructuring contexts, including Chapter 11 proceedings. These engagements differ materially in purpose, structure, and legal framework.
See: Closing Perspective
Solvency and insolvency opinions are typically obtained when financial decisions carry legal, fiduciary, or creditor implications.
Because these opinions are frequently reviewed under adverse or contested circumstances, independence, analytical rigor, and disciplined documentation are essential. Additionally, timing in these cases is usually of the essence – at Gato Consulting, we guarantee our timelines.
What sets 
valuations apart
Certified & Standards-Driven
Real Transaction & Continuous Valuation Experience
Independent Peer Review on Every Engagement
Powered by Institutional-Grade Databases
Court-Ready Work
Guaranteed Timelines - or you pay less
A Valuation you can Trust • A Report you can defend • A process that follows your timeline